I fully realize that a lot of what I
write is, in many ways, hermetic, willfully dense, frantic, and fully
ensconced within a very specific world of signs and allusions. This
isn't one of those. If most of what I write is designed as a
high-intensity sprint, this is a Netflix-and-chill.
A few days ago, I went to a French
restaurant near my office for lunch. Owing to the almost
litigation-bating nature of Thai defamation law, I'll leave it
nameless, but quite a few people familiar with the Silom-Sathorn area
dining scene should be able to figure it out.
So therefore let this not be a
description of a specific restaurant in a specific place, but a
typology of awfulness, an index of bad taste and poor decisions both
fiscal and aesthetic. Because what is universal is not necessarily
something abstract – it can be as concrete and as simple as a
cracked, dusty window.
You hear about a place nearby with a
lunch discount. It's the sort of place you've walked by countless
times, vaguely wondered about, especially given the setting, a
particularly lovely, creaking old mansion in a neighborhood full of
restaurants in lovely, creaking old mansions. There's the old adage
about it being impossible to get a bad meal in Paris, and if you're
someone like me, there's a strong appeal for French ingredients,
French technique, both in terms of its complexity and its position as
an antique tradition.
And hey, there's that big lunch
discount. What could go wrong?
There are too many waitstaff on the
floor, half of them checking their phones. The only other visible
customers are elderly Thai women with elaborately ugly hairdos –
this at the lunch rush in the middle of the city's financial
district. There are plenty of awards by the door, but all of them
seem to be 10 or 15 years old, and come from a magazine largely
dedicated to the charity efforts of socialites whose Armani suits and
Birkin bags are paid for by wage theft, environmental degradation,
tax evasion, and rent-seeking.
The main decor is, of course, kitschy
bullshit of various types. Kitschy art-deco bullshit in the form of
reproduced classic movie posters, kitschy Victorian bullshit in the
form of reproduction Tiffany lamps, and kitschy Rococo bullshit in
the form of silhouette portraits of Georgian ladies and gentlemen to
indicate the bathrooms, which reek of artificial jasmine scent, so
you'll feel like Marie Antoinette when you're taking a dump.
And of course, the cherubim. Cherubim
in plaster moldings, statues of cherubim, and a particularly hideous
painting of a cherub stealing a kiss off of the other, so poorly
rendered that their gender is indistinguishable, other than the
rounded choad-nubbin standing in for male genitalia on the one, and
the facial expression of a recent sexual assault victim on the other.
Dejected, your eyes turn to the menu. A
cocktail to start? Other than a few stalwarts, there seems to be all
too much creativity of the 1980s variety (a nod, perhaps, to the smooth-jazz mix of the unmarried boomer aunt variety they've selected for the dining room). Blue curacao makes numerous
appearances, along with other dubious, artificially flavored
cordials, and completely misnamed cocktails – what the fuck is
amaretto doing in an old-fashioned?
The food isn't any better. Foie gras on
top of cream sauce and other menu items that have made the crucial
error of conflating cholesterol with luxuriousness. And of course,
instead of local produce, the owners feel the need to prove how far
away their product comes from by serving lobster, scallops, and
“snowfish” (local jargon for Chilean sea bass), all of which have
been languishing in the freezer for months, taste like low tide, and
are simultaneously spongy and rubbery – seafood platter a la
Goodyear.
I've put on the fake smiles, knowing
full well that the waitstaff can do nothing to rectify this bullshit,
and get the bill. Had I not gotten the discount, it would have come
to more than 2000 baht (about 60 dollars US) for a couple of small,
“recommended” dishes and a glass of Semillon. I walk back to the
office in a lousy state.
None of the above will come as any
surprise to Bangkokians. There are any number of familiar types of
terrible, overpriced eatery in a city rightly renowned as a place to
get an excellent meal for dirt cheap. There is the shitty hipster
place opened by recent grads from wealthy families who care more
about the Instagrammability of the place (check all that apply: menu
on clipboard, metal shelves with like three books on them that the
owners almost certainly didn't read, Edison lightbulbs, squid ink)
than the quality of the food, the tourist-friendly Thai restaurant
that purges local favorites of any spice or complexity and is
decorated with all manner of chintzy “Thai” bric-a-brac, the
brightly-lit seafood-market type joint that caters to busloads of
mainland Chinese, and so forth. The out-of-date French or Italian
restaurant is just one more iteration.
Which is why I'll be making my trout
amandine at home, and enjoying it far more.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete