In my mid-teens, I was given a
Christmas present, a copy of a book called The Dictionary of
Imaginary Places (binding
already cracked – guess my parents couldn't help themselves). And
when I look back on it, it's impossible to calculate the influence on
my thought since.
The whole premise
is that it is a catalog of imaginary places, along with tips for
imagined travelers, which are actually quite narrowly defined. For
instance, any place that is really just a stand-in for a real place
is excluded (e.g. Faulkner's Yoknapatawpha County, Mississippi). As
is anything “not on Earth,” whether in heaven or hell or on
another planet. And last, and most controversially and infuriatingly,
those places that “could” exist based on the logic of how we
assume the world to work, such as the decaying home of Dickens' Miss
Havisham. These were places of pure irreality, and this was designed
as the guidebook.
This
was also natural extension of who I was as a child who had loved the
classification of all things, taking out all of my toy cars and
baseball cards and sorting them in infinite ways, who had loved
atlases and encyclopedias and anything that sought to contain the
world. Sure, for several years, I had been an American teenager, with
everything that implied, and moreover had been a smart enough, snarky
enough American teenager around the turn of the 21st
Century (see attached items: Nirvana's “Nevermind,” Outkast's
“Stankonia,” Donnie Darko, Lost in Translation), and had a lot of
fuck-you in me, but I was still someone who loved the scientific
organization of things, especially in geography (the laws of all
space) and geology (space and time as expressed in the ground beneath
our feet).
I was already
familiar with a number of the authors mentioned. A number of the
haunts of broadly familiar characters showed up – the Wizard of Oz,
the Beauty and the Beast, Sherlock Holmes, and Harry Potter all made
appearances. But a few of the locales reflected what I considered to
be a more idiosyncratic vein. Like H.P. Lovecraft, an unhappy
proto-neckbeard who tried to write like a vampire lord locked in his
castle, and decorated his prose with long-abandoned archaeological
and paleontological jargon. Or Jorge Luis Borges, with his famous
classification of all animals by a Chinese scholar, most likely a
fiction of Borges himself, a man who could rest comfortably with the
unchallengeability of his breadth of esoteric knowledge in a
pre-Internet era, and who could therefore simply be cast as an
all-knowing mandarin (as an aside, one of the co-authors, Alberto
Manguel, had occupied role previously held by Borges, as the director
of the National Library of Argentina).
But there was
something else, a hint of the future. A whole index of names to look
into for starters, writers who also dreamed of vast imaginary worlds,
but also didn't constrain themselves to the “speculative” genres,
and who certainly weren't widely read in Middle America.
And the text was
accompanied with these almost Victorian maps and unearthly
engravings, so clearly modeled on the frontispieces of the sort of
books I would find at used bookstores and libraries, antique editions
of Gothic romances and boys' adventure books and epistolary novels
and scientists' travelogues no one had read in years.
Perhaps those that
I would most obviously fall in love with could be called
“postmodernists,” and I was to read their books in short order.
Umberto Eco, for one, and Italo Calvino, whose work I would soon
develop a fawning love of.
After all, the
first edition of the Dictionary of Imaginary Places was
published in 1980, just as American audiences were first becoming
familiar with the concepts that would soon become ensconced in
college humanities departments as “theory” – intertextuality,
Barthes' death of the author, the idea of the world as essentially
consisting of sign systems.
But
what interested me more, in the long run, were all of the forgottens
and also-rans from much earlier eras. Who knew, for instance, that L.
Frank Baum wrote countless other books set in the world of Oz? And
there were other writers, people like Anthony Hope, Paul Féval,
Horace Walpole, and James Branch Cabell who once commanded massive
audiences, but have now been left to gather mildew. It's not so much
that I was necessarily interested in these guys as writers – to be
honest, I still haven't finished a single book by most of them, and
some of them that I have tried to read have proven turgidly
unreadable in that particular pre-modernist way – but more that
they represented a current in popular fiction, which back then
constituted a major part of the popular imagination that has since
been abandoned.
And
some were simply unavailable – I'm remembering one in particular. A
book by the 19th
Century Italian author Amedeo Tosetti, Pedali
sul Mar Nero,
in which “Tartars” on bicycles lived inside a steel egg called
Malacovia in the marshes at the mouth of the Danube. Something I
always kept an eye out for, before realizing it was never translated.
It
was only in discovering places that never existed that I discovered
places and times that did exist. So consequently, it did act as a
guidebook for me, albeit in a completely different way.
Fiction
becomes the way in which we see features of our reality separate from
immediate perception. Like a camera obscura, we see our world turned
upside down, and see the things we never saw before.